In our modern day world of public privacy is assaulted from any and all available ways possible one needs to take a "Pro-active??" position to protect themselves from government/corporate intrusion.
Now I know.. "If I'm not doing anything wrong..." is the government mantra crammed down the public collective psyche if any one has a problem with their privacy being violated by the said official protectors of our privacy. I don't even like my well liked and respected super market tracking my buying habits to use on me in an attempt to separate more money from me to them. It's none of their business what I buy! And BTW? Since we're here being beaten by inane and invalid mantra's.. How about you government/corporations? Seems just about everything you do is confidential, classified and of course private. And a sacred private that is to never be questioned! It wouldn't be because you are doing wrongs.. would it? Anything to hide?? National security means if they find out about this they will burn the capital down to the ground?
And I also know another inane and invalid mantra crammed down our public psyche is they need to violate our privacy so they can better protect us! I'm not even going to go there except to say it is the government itself we need protection from!! Understand?
For those of you that value your privacy and wish to protect yourself from government tracking using the information not only incorrectly.. as they most always do.. but also as another club of force to use against you.. as they also most always do... a true and the proverbial "double edged sword"... you might want to consider software to help you personally managing your cookies. It is not just yes or no to all.
Cookies for you I trust but NO cookies for you I don't trust!
Once again yet another "Stumbled upon" internet artifact? God only knows what will come across my radar, where I will go and what will be "In my Face" at this particular moment during internet "excursions".
It's the "choice" thing that makes it completely unpredictable you understand. The internet offers so many choices and I have so little time to view them all. So I must select what is next based solely upon "The heat" of my moment. Prioritize, filter and select where I will go next and what I will land upon. Which an hour from now the same exact trajectory could land me in a completely, radically!!, different place.
Not even close???? In my defense? Well that was an hour ago!!! OMG duh.. the far distant past... I was a completely different person then??
The "artifact" is a YouTube video by Anonymous entitled "Do you see what I see?" First off let me make real clear I am NOT a devotee, groupie, disciple nor big believer in the internet "Anonymmous" thing? It's the "Anonymous" that throws me off. Big red flags, lots of suspicion/mistrust as to where/who it is coming from and why is it hidden. Hidden? Red flag? So the grain of salt, or box, may need to be applied here.
Here is the video I felt worthy of echoing simply for the information presented to us within it. OMG it's embarrassing what are we doing??? This will not end good for us ALL if we don't put a stop to this and change. Do you see it to?
Anonymous - DO YOU SEE WHAT I SEE?
You can ignore reality, but we cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.
― Ayn Rand
We can do so much better than this. It's the choices we make that define what we now will have to deal with. We have to lose the losers as soon as they have been properly identified. They rely upon us allowing them to make OUR choices for us all.
But let it not be said that we did nothing...
- Ron Paul
Specifically.. the question is NOT "Should she be president?"
The questions we all should be asking and want answered are:
In all fairness Hillary should NOT be singled out for career criminality. Her husband, Slick Willy, is also a career criminal and WAS governor and president. So are Bush Senior and the apple doesn't fall far from the tree Bush Junior. Obama seems to be a newcomer to this field of political criminality but he is building a wonderful history of it.
It also seems that Hillary may be a "Congenital Liar". Seems this label is being applied to her from many different sources whom have had dealings with her.
Another question? Not a liar.. not even a pathological liar.. A "Congenital Liar?"
In the vernacular, a congenital liar is someone who just cannot tell the truth. Now, medical scientists tend to use the term "genetically congenital liar" for those people who are genetically destined to be liars.
I mean just google "congenital liar" and take notice of Hillary's name all over the search results. You know.. as in "See picture" in an encyclopedia? Imagine what ever image of Hillary that works for you in the encyclopedia next to the congenital liar definition.
It just begs another question:
On the other hand being a "Congenital liar" could mean that you are a natural born politician and have what it takes to become president in America! May the best lies win!! Isn't that right Obama?
And it may be true that when she tells the American public she is "Working for us" it is a blatant and obvious lie. BUT!!! When she says it to her husband it is the gospel truth!!! Meaning, of course, that she is able to tell the truth therefore she is NOT a "Congenital liar!!" Once again Hillary is being falsely AND wrongly accused?
And finally there might be one more question we all should be asking instead:
Hillary Clinton: A Career Criminal
Years ago I came across a book written by a doctor informing the reader about "Home Remedies" for many common ailments.
Yes it was a book... this was LONG before the Internet. And the information that doctor and his book gave me let me glean into the reasoning that may motivate those who think some books should be burned and their author denigrated.
The two things I came away with most impressive from that doctor and his book was Apple Cider Vinegar(Anti-bacterial) and Crushed Garlic(Gram-negative Anti-biotic). Both, across the years of my life since that reading, have proved themselves to not only be true but amazingly effective also! So effective and so fast that if you are anything like me? It will leave you all pissed off about modern medical science, their mandatory doctor office visits and pharmaceutical industry pill prescriptions!
Let me relate a few true experience in my life stories about them both.
Today in L.A.
Apparently government once again is preventing people from helping other people. That's NOT allowed!!!! You know? You need government permission and licensing to feed someone if they are hungry? After all the government has to ensure what you are feeding them is healthy and safe. Of course the fact that starving to death instead, which is generally not healthy nor safe, is the healthier and safer alternative according to government.
Out in L.A. someone got the idea to construct small shelter units, basically a plywood garden shed, meagerly powered to provide "tiny houses" for the homeless. And yes, of course, that is not government permitted nor allowed. It's a "Health and safety" problem! Unlike sleeping out in the open on the street which is not???
I just don't get it. You know.. eyes squinting and mouth agape as they speak trying desperately to make some, any, kind of sense out of their words??
One has to wonder before power grids, and more importantly property taxes, where did people live that was not un-fit for human habitation? OMG how did they manage to survive such an un-healthy and un-safe environment??
It's shelter.. no? Give me access to food, water and facilities.. and I'm good!??! Seems to me it is a much better and more economical solution to the problem than insane dysfunctional financial black hole spending they are still on the street government programs currently in place. I have no idea why homeless is an epidemic and rapidly growing problem with all this government love, spending and protection??? Monsanto, Halliburton and KBR are living large and luxurious with government love, spending and protection.
And here is an article by the government propaganda sell insanity mouthpiece, I mean L.A. Times, explaining how government is protecting us as they force people out of shelter onto the street. This is a good and right thing they do:
Obviously by providing the homeless with shelter you are creating criminality and drug problems. So therefore government reasoning tells us keeping them homeless on the street prevents it??
Eyes squinting.. Mouth agape.. Try as hard as I may I just can't do it.. I swear it is impossible!!!
|<< <||> >>|