Pages: << 1 ... 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 ... 123 >>


Permalink 01:12:13 pm, by trebor Email , 448 words   English (US)
Categories: Views, Politics

America Today: The Regulated Regulate Regulators

"America Today" is not actually technically correct here. Understand "America Today" is in truth two completely different federal governments. There is the one and only original 'De Jure' organic republic, you know...

  • We are free?
  • Limited Constitutional Government?
  • Rule of law?
  • Of the people, by the people, for the people?
  • Light of the world?

Then there is the cheap knock off Washington DC, US Inc, 'De Facto' usurping treasonous criminal pretenders. You know...

  • NOT We are free?
  • NOT Limited Constitutional Government?
  • NOT Rule of law?
  • NOT Of the people, by the people, for the people?
  • NOT Light of the world?
  • NOT even part of America foreign?

To be sure two completely different animals. The original De Jure was a servant of the free sovereigns and answered to the people. The De Facto pretenders, US Inc, serves the bankers, corporations and powerful special interests and has all the signatures of being a Fascist/Corporatist dictatorship. In fact US Inc. is totally owned and controlled by the FED in bankrupt receivership to them.

Once you understand that US Inc. does what is best for the bankers, corporations and powerful special interests, criminal rule of law does not apply when you own the "Police", it should be a simple thing to put together: "The Regulated Regulate Regulators".

USDA, FDA, FEC, EPA, DOC, DOA... it does not matter which alphabet big government regulatory agency we are talking about. In fact it is not even limited to regulatory agencies for instance DoD. Virtually ALL are head up and run by insiders from the sectors of industry they are supposed to be regulating/representing.

Google "Revolving Door" or better yet take a look at this revolving door list at

EPA is there to protect the big corporations raping the environment. FDA is there to ensure big money can be made from food/drugs without a lot on needless safety testing. Almost all of Obama's cabinet appointments are "bankers". And so on..

You didn't think the big US Inc. alphabet agencies are actually there to protect you did you? All these big alphabet agencies will come down hard on you for the smallest suggestion of infraction. Keep you under control, keep you in line, keep you believing the agency is actually doing what they are supposed to do.

Banks, corporations and powerful special interests control and run federal agencies. Does "Fox guarding the hen house" mean anything to you?

How about Criminal? Corrupt? Treasonous? Do we even care? Too much TV? Too much fluoridated water? Not my Johnny as he is the anti-Christ from hell terrorizing the planetary neighborhood?

Ah... US Inc. A criminal corrupt fascist corporatist dictatorship. USA! USA! USA! (Wave flag)


Permalink 02:12:29 pm, by trebor Email , 905 words   English (US)
Categories: Views

Ad Hominem: How To Win Any Argument

In particular arguments that can NOT be won by using things like reason, logic, facts, truth nor any other recognized measure for testing validity in animated contests.

So.. when your argumentative opponent recognizes that what you are throwing at them is obviously BS.. pull out and hit them with an Ad hominem!

Ad hominem? Short for 'argumentum ad hominem'. Not exactly words that are commonly heard at the dinner table, in the office, on TV nor most any social interaction. I suppose most when hearing these words interpret them something like.. roughly: "Eh???"

Yet it is very commonly used and very well known what it means and the effectiveness when properly applied.. even at the dinner table.

You've just been "Ad hominem'd" and didn't even know it!?

A very nice definition can be found at

ad hominem:


  1. appealing to one's prejudices, emotions, or special interests rather than to one's intellect or reason.
  2. attacking an opponent's character rather than answering his argument.

To be sure I found some "definitions" that were not so nice. A bit funny even. Smelled like, looked like, felt like.. "How can I answer this one with out answering this one?" If you know what I mean... I'm not going to point pointers...

Getting back to applied Ad hominemics(?) which is needed ever more and more in today's world of "BS for sale" is epidemic. Some examples might help clarify it's proper use and effectiveness.

We Are Change Confronts Bill Clinton in Minnesota

This first one is a video of We Are Change activists confronting Bill Clinton about 9/11 being an inside job, the Bohemian Grove and the like. Pay real close attention to how "Slick Willy" answers, more accurately avoids answering, the confrontations. Irrefutable overwhelming evidence that the World Trade Center was taken down with controlled demolitions. Beyond dispute it can not be rationally argued against. Do your own learning about that. How did Willy answer? Roughly.. "It was not an inside job because I knew someone who was severely injured and needed major reconstructive surgery to recover... ad hominem, ad hominem.." Slick.. real slick... "I'll be glad to answer your question if you will shut up and let me talk!"... ad hominem. Bohemian Grove? hominem. Notice also the effectiveness with the crowd of Willy answering with ad hominems.

Actually there was a video I had in mind for this but could not quickly find it. It was Willy being confronted about 9/11 being an inside job and his answer was something like.. "How dare you.." say such a thing.. ad hominem.

Al Gore's Lies Exposed By Congress

Here is another example. This time Al is in the congressional hearing hot seat being confronted about his claim the man made global warming science is settled.. Al say's there is a consensus about it!

Quick overview.. the UN committee coming to this "Science is settled consensus" that Al is waving around as official is being called into question. The UN committee has 1,500-2,500 "Scientists". It turns out very very few are actual "Climatologists". And in fact most are political bureaucratic scientists from totally unrelated fields. What the confronter is trying to point out to Al that in fact there is a petition of something like 35,000 actual, real and true genuine Climatologists that are pissed off about this UN science conclusion. Do NOT agree with it at all! Do your own research about the truth of this it is not within the scope of this post.

Getting back to Al's confronter suggesting "Geez Al... there are a LOT of Climatologists that say that claim is absurd BS! Al's answer? yep.. "There are people that believe the moon landing was staged on a movie lot!".. ad hominem avoid the facts and suggest your challenger is some kind of fool insane a nut job for saying such a thing! The only answer possible when you have been obliterated and caught in an un-winnable position.

There was another video with Al being questioned in congressional hearing where he was confronted about his apparent conflict of interests about this. In particular he was challenged about having significant financial investments based upon his bogus claim being real. Al's answer.. yep.. jist.. "If you think that you don't know me at all! I am offended and insulted!" rather than explain his actual financial investments she was referring to.. she is the bad wrong person for even asking such a thing it does not deserve an answer.. Ad hominem.

Politicians seem to be expert at Ad hominem they rely on it major. Understand they say one thing then do another and when confronted? Ad hominem! The examples from them abound just listen to any interactive conversation carefully Ad hominems are plentiful.

Nancy Pelosi Confronter: "Where in the Constitution do you get the authority to do such a thing?!"
Nancy Pelosi's answer: "Are you kidding?" Delivered like you're some kind of insane maniac... Ad hominem.

Truther, birther, deniar... all are ad hominems used to avoid the actual un-winnable debate. In fact we just love negative and derogatory labels that have no basis in fact nor reason and are just pure ad hominem. Fringe, flake, extremist... ad nauseum.

It may help to think of ad hominem this way: "When you can't destroy the message.. destroy the messenger!".

Q: "Why did you do that?"
A: "I don't like the tone of your voice!"

Yes.. absurd.. yes.. it works very well...


Halo effect


Permalink 03:37:49 pm, by trebor Email , 108 words   English (US)
Categories: MatrixUSA Updates

MatrixUSA Updated: Docs Page: Fall Of The Republic: The Presidency Of Barack H Obama

MatrixUSA has been updated. Fall Of The Republic: The Presidency Of Barack H Obama has been added to the Docs Page.

Did you think Obama actually cared about you and I the little people? His entire cabinet is virtually completely staffed with Wall Street Bankers. Said another way... the Wall Street Bankers, the FED in particular, are running the White House, running the Government, emptying the financial vaults of America..

..The largest fraud and scam in the history of the world is happening right now. They will walk away rich after stealing criminal the entire wealth of a our country. You will lose it all including your country.

Permalink 09:50:34 am, by trebor Email , 1304 words   English (US)
Categories: Views, The Net, Politics

Election 2012: Vote For Who TV Tells You To Vote For

Why not? We've been letting the TV tell us who to vote for for decades. We've also been letting the TV tell us who NOT to vote for. In fact the TV has done the majority of our thinking for us on most any issue. What's important, what's not important, what's in style, what's the latest fad and trend...

What's "EVERYONE" thinking and doing? Just turn on the TV, let your mind go blank, and everything you need to know will be expertly put right into your head.

And you wonder why we never get change? Madison Avenue Marketing at it's finest. It's magic!

Just as important, let's not let this get lost somehow, is letting the TV tells us who NOT to vote for, what NOT to think, what NOT to do...

Is there a way I can get a TV surgically implanted right in my brain? Maybe just replace my brain...

Last election, 2008, the TV told us Obama was the messiah himself from Krypton. Everybody wants Obama he is a rock star the people can't get enough of their new savior. He just happened to "magically" appear out of nowhere, from Kenya no less, to stop the wars, fix all the problems, clean up DC corruption, bring transparency to the people, blah, blah, blah... take it to the bank!

Obama does have a rock solid history of top ten corruption. Still looking for that bank are you? How is all that hope and change working for you?

On the other hand in 2008 Ron Paul, who has a long stellar history winning awards, well read, written and clearly a Constitutional class statesman, special interests do not even bother knocking on his door, actually tells you the truth, talks about real issues, several obviously he knows what he is talking about successful predictions and basically wants to drain the DC swamp? TV told us he is a nobody flake fringe mad man... Don't vote for him. Don't even talk about or think about him!

Hmmmm... A nobody extremely corrupt duplicitous foreigner or a seasoned honest extremely knowledgeable statesman with stellar history???

TV! It's magic! Still looking for that bank are you? How is all that hope and change working for you?

Now it's 2012... got your TV turned on? All plugged in are you? Up on the latest polls, stats, issues and other TV "expert" pundit "reporting"? Got your finger right solid on the pulse of TV reality do you? Here we go again.. TV magic! Romney is the TV declared everybody wants him front runner! Again.. Ron Paul is a TV declared loser nobody is interested in him. TV has all your thinking laid out for you nice and easy, you don't have to do a thing, just relax and let your mind go blank. Years and years of practice at this we should all be real good at it by now. TV programming magic!

Now I know this may be hard for you it requires an attention span of a few minutes but tough it out. It is an example of why you should never, ever, turn your TV off nor get information from other sources instead of TV.

From the Internet. Concerning Romney/Paul popularity with the people:

Ron Paul IS BEATING Romney/ The media LIES! Watch This!
Above is a link on his foreign policy. A MUST SEE!

Proof that Ron Paul is beating Romney and the media lies to us!
Romney can't put together a crowd and should be embarrassed
at the difference in the turnouts for him versus Ron Paul.
How can it be possible that he has won nearly every state?
Nobody has won anything yet, the counts they announce on the television
are only Straw Polls and not real votes! They are an illusion, an estimation,
a guess at what might happen in the future, and a trick on the public to make them think
Ron Paul doesn't have a chance.
But the public is waking up to the deception and won't be tricked anymore
Ron Paul 2012

If you don't believe this video then take a MINUTE and do a search on you tube
Run a search on Ron Paul crowd, then run a search on Mitt Romney crowd
and see what comes back! Santorum and Gingrich don't even pull a big enough
crowd to even mention!

Well.. there you have it! This is why you should never, ever turn your TV off and get your information from other sources. AND!! This is also a wonderful example of why the Internet is a bad and dangerous place that needs government "Regulation".

Romney who has a multimillion dollar war chest, courtesy of the big bank wall street 1%, barely draws dozens on his stumping tour around the country. And honestly the small pathetic crowds look and act disinterested?

Paul on the other hand, no money at all from the big bank wall street 1%, draws crowds measured in the thousands. Sell outs. Standing room only. And the large crowds receive him and are animated as if he is a Rock Star! Lets just say very energetic and engaged.

This is just one example of why you should never turn your TV off. This is why you should never seek your own information about what is going on and what is real. If you do this too often the whole TV Magic thing vanishes like it is nothing but illusion. You'll have to do your own thinking, your own investigation research and ultimately live a totally alien and alternate reality.

It's an oil and water thing they don't mix. One or the other. The two conflict.

Let the TV again tell us who to vote for, not to vote for, trust us, things just keep getting better and better, no?



"It's been demonstrated that well within two minutes of watching television, most people enter a hypnotic alpha state bordering on theta, [a trance-like state induced by the flicker of the television broadcast signal]. Viewers in this state are no longer able to critically evaluate, discern, or pass judgement from their own moral database on the material being viewed. The information just flows, unimpeded, into their subconscious year in and year out." -Rense

Fall Of The Republic documents how an offshore corporate cartel is bankrupting the US economy by design. Leaders are now declaring that world government has arrived and that the dollar will be replaced by a new global currency.

President Obama has brazenly violated Article 1 Section 9 of the US Constitution by seating himself at the head of United Nations' Security Council, thus becoming the first US president to chair the world body.

A scientific dictatorship is in its final stages of completion, and laws protecting basic human rights are being abolished worldwide; an iron curtain of high-tech tyranny is now descending over the planet.

A worldwide regime controlled by an unelected corporate elite is implementing a planetary carbon tax system that will dominate all human activity and establish a system of neo-feudal slavery.

The image makers have carefully packaged Obama as the world's savior; he is the Trojan Horse manufactured to pacify the people just long enough for the globalists to complete their master plan.

This film reveals the architecture of the New World Order and what the power elite have in store for humanity. More importantly it communicates how We The People can retake control of our government, turn the criminal tide and bring the tyrants to justice.

Video from "Fall of the Republic"

Full video here:


Permalink 05:39:45 pm, by admin Email , 248 words   English (US)
Categories: MatrixUSA Updates

MatrixUSA Updated: Docs Page: The Collectivist Conspiracy

MatrixUSA has been updated. The Collectivist Conspiracy, an interview with G. Edward Griffin, has been added to the Docs Page.

Collectivism, AKA, Socialism, AKA, Fascism, AKA, Communism says sacrifice individual rights and liberties for the "Greater Good"! In other words... 51% of the people can tell the other 49% of the people what they will do and support.

Mob rule. Historically not a good social model many times ending up very badly brutal police states trying to hold it together and enforce this faulty ideology.

G. Edward Griffin, Researcher of the first order, researches "Collectivism" right here, right now, in America.

America, Individualism by Constitutional birthright. 99% of the people can NOT tell 1% of the people what to do. Historical.. the great experiment.. history has seen nothing like it an explosion of prosperity, abundance and freedom. The largest and most affluent middle class the world has ever known.

Collectivism, Socialism.. only works until you run out of other peoples money to pay for things. Why should I pay for you to do nothing? I might as well do nothing! Or.. I might as well leave this place and go where what I do belongs to me, not you! Therein lies the underlying flaw in the Collectivist premise. Not to mention the big attitude the 49% have because they are forced by government to support what they are religiously, philosophically and/or morally extremely opposed to.

America today? Watch this doc before you go waving flags. G. Edward tells it like it is.

<< 1 ... 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 ... 123 >>

February 2016
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29          


WebThis Site
From Dec, 18, 2013

XML Feeds

powered by b2evolution